TL;DR: Political science essays need a clear thesis, evidence from credible sources (peer-reviewed journals, government data, reputable news), and logical argument structure. Avoid opinion without evidence, summarizing without analyzing, and emotional language. Follow the standard format: intro with thesis, body paragraphs with evidence, counterargument, and conclusion.

What Makes Political Science Writing Different?

Political science essays aren't like English lit papers where you analyze metaphors. And they aren't like history essays where you tell a story about the past.

Poli sci writing is about making arguments backed by evidence. You're taking a position on a political question and defending it with data, case studies, and scholarly sources.

The challenge? Almost everything in politics is contested. Reasonable people disagree. So your job isn't to prove you're "right" — it's to build the strongest possible case for your position while acknowledging and addressing opposing views.

Let's walk through how to do that well.

Types of Political Science Essays

Before you start writing, know what type of essay you're dealing with:

Analytical Essay

Examine a political phenomenon and explain how/why it works. Example: "How does gerrymandering affect voter turnout in midterm elections?"

Argumentative/Position Essay

Take a stance on a political issue and defend it. Example: "Universal basic income would reduce poverty more effectively than current welfare programs."

Comparative Essay

Compare political systems, policies, or events across countries or time periods. Example: "Compare healthcare policy outcomes between the UK's NHS and the US's ACA."

Policy Analysis

Evaluate a specific policy's effectiveness and propose improvements. Example: "Evaluate the effectiveness of federal student loan forgiveness programs."

Research Paper

A longer, more in-depth investigation of a political question using primary and secondary sources.

Each type requires a slightly different approach, but the core elements (thesis, evidence, analysis) remain the same.

Step 1: Develop a Strong Thesis

Your thesis is the most important sentence in the paper. It tells the reader exactly what you're arguing.

What Makes a Good Poli Sci Thesis?

A strong thesis is:

Specific — not vague or overly broad
Arguable — reasonable people could disagree
Evidence-based — can be supported with data and sources
Clear — reader knows your position immediately

Examples

Weak: "Immigration policy is important." (Too vague, not arguable, no position)

Better: "The 2017 travel ban was unconstitutional." (Takes a position, but too simple — just states a conclusion)

Strong: "The 2017 executive order on immigration, while framed as a national security measure, exceeded presidential authority by implementing a de facto religious test, as demonstrated by the administration's own statements and the order's disproportionate impact on Muslim-majority nations." (Specific, arguable, outlines the evidence path)

The "So What?" Test

After writing your thesis, ask yourself: "So what? Why does this matter?" If you can't answer that, your thesis might be too narrow or trivial.

Step 2: Find and Use Evidence

Political science values several types of evidence:

Primary Sources

Government documents (legislation, executive orders, court decisions)
Official statistics (Census Bureau, BLS, World Bank)
Treaties and international agreements
Congressional records and testimonies
Polling data (Pew, Gallup, ANES)

Secondary Sources

Peer-reviewed journal articles (American Political Science Review, Journal of Politics, etc.)
Academic books from university presses
Working papers from think tanks (Brookings, RAND, Heritage, Cato — note their ideological positions)
Reputable news analysis (avoiding opinion pieces)

What Doesn't Count as Evidence

Wikipedia (use it for background, not citation)
Random blog posts or opinion articles
Social media posts (unless analyzing discourse)
Undated, unsourced websites
Your personal opinion without supporting data

How to Use Evidence Effectively

Bad: "Gun control reduces crime (Smith, 2023)." (Just dropping a citation isn't analysis)

Good: "Smith's (2023) analysis of handgun regulations across 50 states found that states with universal background check requirements experienced 12% fewer firearm homicides, even after controlling for urbanization and poverty rates. This suggests that targeted regulatory measures can reduce gun violence without implementing comprehensive bans." (Specific findings, methodology noted, connected to argument)

Step 3: Structure Your Essay

Introduction (1-2 paragraphs)

Hook: Start with a compelling fact, quote, or question
Context: Brief background on the issue
Thesis: Your main argument
Roadmap: Briefly outline how you'll support your argument

Body Paragraphs (3-6+ depending on length)

Each body paragraph should follow this pattern:

Topic sentence — Mini-thesis for this paragraph
Evidence — Data, quotes, case studies
Analysis — Explain what the evidence means and why it supports your argument
Transition — Connect to the next paragraph

Counterargument Section (1-2 paragraphs)

This is where poli sci essays differ from many other types. You MUST address the strongest argument against your position.

Structure:

Present the opposing argument fairly (don't create a strawman)
Acknowledge any valid points
Explain why your argument is still stronger
Use evidence to rebut

Example: "Critics of universal background checks argue that criminals don't acquire firearms through legal channels, making such regulations ineffective (Johnson, 2022). While it's true that the black market accounts for some illegal firearms, ATF trace data shows that 77% of guns used in crimes were originally purchased through legal transactions (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, 2023). This suggests that strengthening the legal purchasing process would disrupt the primary pipeline through which firearms enter criminal hands."

Conclusion (1 paragraph)

Restate your thesis (different wording)
Summarize your key evidence
Broader implications: Why does this matter?
Possible areas for future research (for longer papers)
Do NOT introduce new arguments

Writing Style for Political Science

Do:

Use precise, specific language
Define key terms (especially contested ones like "democracy," "liberalism," "nationalism")
Be objective in tone (even when taking a position)
Use data and statistics when available
Write in active voice when possible
Use hedging language appropriately ("suggests," "indicates," "tends to")

Don't:

Use emotional or inflammatory language
Make sweeping generalizations ("Everyone knows that...")
Use first person unless your professor allows it
Include unsupported opinions
Use contractions in formal papers (though some professors are fine with it)
Use overly complex sentences — clarity beats sophistication

Political Science Vocabulary

Strengthen your essays with precise terminology:

"Institutions" — formal and informal rules governing political behavior
"Political actors" — individuals and groups in the political process
"Policy outcomes" — measurable results of government action
"Legitimacy" — accepted right to exercise authority
"Sovereignty" — supreme authority within a territory
"Pluralism" — multiple competing interests in democratic politics
"Hegemony" — dominant influence of one state or group

Citation Format

Most political science courses use one of these:

APSA (American Political Science Association) — similar to Chicago
Chicago/Turabian — footnotes or author-date
APA — common in some programs

Always check your syllabus. When in doubt, ask.

For APA format help, check our APA format citation guide.

Common Mistakes in Poli Sci Essays

1. Confusing opinion with argument

Opinion: "I think the Electoral College is bad." Argument: "The Electoral College undermines democratic representation by allowing candidates to win the presidency without a plurality of popular votes, as occurred in 2000 and 2016."

2. Summarizing instead of analyzing

Don't just describe what happened. Explain why it happened, what it means, and why it matters.

3. Cherry-picking evidence

Using only evidence that supports your argument while ignoring contradicting data destroys your credibility. Address counterevidence directly.

4. Being too broad

"The causes of political polarization" is a book topic, not an essay topic. Narrow it: "How social media algorithms contribute to partisan sorting among voters aged 18-29."

5. Ignoring methodology

If you cite a study, note its methodology. A survey of 500 people and a comprehensive analysis of voting records carry different weight.

6. Not defining terms

Words like "freedom," "equality," and "democracy" mean different things to different people. Define how you're using them.

Sample Essay Outline

Topic: The impact of voter ID laws on electoral participation

I. Introduction

Hook: In the 2020 election, 17 million eligible voters cited "registration problems" or "ID issues" as reasons for not voting (Census Bureau, 2021)
Context: 36 states currently require ID to vote; laws vary in strictness
Thesis: Strict photo ID requirements disproportionately reduce turnout among minority and low-income voters without significantly reducing voter fraud
Roadmap: Will examine turnout data, demographic impact, and fraud evidence

II. Background on Voter ID Laws

Types: non-strict non-photo, non-strict photo, strict non-photo, strict photo
Brief legislative history

III. Impact on Turnout

Evidence from comparative state studies
GAO report findings
Specific turnout data pre/post implementation

IV. Disproportionate Impact

Racial disparities in ID possession
Income-based barriers to obtaining ID
Data from specific states (Texas, North Carolina, Wisconsin)

V. Counterargument: Fraud Prevention

Proponents' arguments about election integrity
Actual incidence data on voter fraud
Rebuttal with proportionality analysis

VI. Conclusion

Restate thesis
Policy implications
Suggestions for further research

Getting Unstuck

Political science essays can feel overwhelming, especially when the topic is complex or you're drowning in sources. Here are some strategies:

Start with your thesis. If you can't state your argument in one sentence, you're not ready to write yet.
Outline before writing. Poli sci essays live or die by their structure.
Use Gradily to help organize your arguments and make sure your evidence actually supports your claims.
Read model essays. Your professor may have examples, or look at published op-eds in Foreign Affairs, The Atlantic, or Brookings reports for style guidance.
Talk to your TA. Office hours exist for this. Use them.

Wrapping Up

Writing a strong political science essay comes down to three things: a clear argument, solid evidence, and honest engagement with opposing views.

Don't just share opinions — build arguments. Don't just cite sources — analyze them. And don't ignore counterarguments — address them head-on.

Political science writing is a skill you'll use well beyond college. The ability to construct a logical, evidence-based argument is valuable in law, policy, journalism, business, and basically any career where you need to persuade people with facts rather than emotions.

Want more writing guides? Check out how to write an argumentative essay, research paper writing, or how to write a thesis statement.

Editorial Standards